Vegas Accident Lawyers
Vegas Lawyer Home
Nevada Injury Attorneys

Criminal Law
Firms By State

Phoenix
Los Angeles
Tucson
Palm Springs
Sacramento
San Diego
San Francisco
San Jose
Denver
Jacksonville
Miami
Orlando
Tampa
Atlanta
Chicago
Indianapolis
Kansas City
Louisville
New Orleans
Boston
Baltimore
Detroit
Grand Rapids
Minneapolis
Charlotte


Find Lawyers
By State

Find A Criminal Defense Lawyer In Denver:

Lawyer Search

Search For Denver Criminal Defense Attorneys And Law Firms:
   

Find Denver Legal Help In These Practice Areas:

Personal Injury Lawyers Product Liability Lawyers
Mesothelioma Lawyers Car Accident Lawyers
Medical Malpractice Other Practice Areas

  • Juvenile delinquency prosecution

  • Criminal Law
    Firms By City

    Omaha
    Raleigh
    Atlantic City
    Las Vegas
    Reno
    Buffalo
    New York City
    Cincinnati
    Cleveland
    Toledo
    Tulsa
    Portland
    Philadelphia
    Pittsburgh
    Myrtle Beach
    Memphis
    Nashville
    Austin
    Dallas
    Houston
    San Antonio
    Salt Lake City
    Richmond
    Seattle
    Spokane

    Find Lawyers
    By City

    Find A Lawyer By State | Search For Attorneys By City | Get Legal Information | Contact Us

    Phoenix Criminal Defense Lawyer • Los Angeles Criminal Defense Lawyer • Tucson Criminal Defense Lawyer • Palm Springs Criminal Defense Lawyer • Sacramento Criminal Defense Lawyer • San Diego Criminal Defense Lawyer • San Francisco Criminal Defense Lawyer • San Jose Criminal Defense Lawyer • Denver Criminal Defense Lawyer • Jacksonville Criminal Defense Lawyer • Miami Criminal Defense Lawyer • Orlando Criminal Defense Lawyer • Tampa Criminal Defense Lawyer • Atlanta Criminal Defense Lawyer • Chicago Criminal Defense Lawyer • Indianapolis Criminal Defense Lawyer • Kansas City Criminal Defense Lawyer • Louisville Criminal Defense Lawyer • New Orleans Criminal Defense Lawyer • Boston Criminal Defense Lawyer • Baltimore Criminal Defense Lawyer • Detroit Criminal Defense Lawyer • Grand Rapids Criminal Defense Lawyer • Minneapolis Criminal Defense Lawyer • Charlotte Criminal Defense Lawyer • Raleigh Criminal Defense Lawyer • Omaha Criminal Defense Lawyer • Atlantic City Criminal Defense Lawyer • Las Vegas Criminal Defense Lawyer • Reno Criminal Defense Lawyer • Buffalo Criminal Defense Lawyer • New York City Criminal Defense Lawyer • Cincinnati Criminal Defense Lawyer • Cleveland Criminal Defense Lawyer • Toledo Criminal Defense Lawyer • Tulsa Criminal Defense Lawyer • Portland Criminal Defense Lawyer • Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer • Pittsburgh Criminal Defense Lawyer • Myrtle Beach Criminal Defense Lawyer • Memphis Criminal Defense Lawyer • Nashville Criminal Defense Lawyer • Austin Criminal Defense Lawyer • Dallas Criminal Defense Lawyer • Houston Criminal Defense Lawyer • San Antonio Criminal Defense Lawyer • Salt Lake City Criminal Defense Lawyer • Richmond Criminal Defense Lawyer • Seattle Criminal Defense Lawyer • Spokane Criminal Defense Lawyer •

    Alabama Criminal Defense Attorney | Alaska Criminal Defense Attorney | Arkansas Criminal Defense Attorney | Arizona Criminal Defense Attorney | California Criminal Defense Attorney | Colorado Criminal Defense Attorney | Connecticut Criminal Defense Attorney | Delaware Criminal Defense Attorney | Dist. of Col. Criminal Defense Attorney | Florida Criminal Defense Attorney | Georgia Criminal Defense Attorney | Hawaii Criminal Defense Attorney | Idaho Criminal Defense Attorney | Illinois Criminal Defense Attorney | Indiana Criminal Defense Attorney | Iowa Criminal Defense Attorney | Kansas Criminal Defense Attorney | Kentucky Criminal Defense Attorney | Louisiana Criminal Defense Attorney | Maine Criminal Defense Attorney | Maryland Criminal Defense Attorney | Massachusetts Criminal Defense Attorney | Michigan Criminal Defense Attorney | Minnesota Criminal Defense Attorney | Mississippi Criminal Defense Attorney | Missouri Criminal Defense Attorney Montana Criminal Defense Attorney | Nebraska Criminal Defense Attorney | Nevada Criminal Defense Attorney | New Hampshire Criminal Defense Attorney | New Jersey Criminal Defense Attorney | New Mexico Criminal Defense Attorney | New York Criminal Defense Attorney | North Carolina Criminal Defense Attorney | North Dakota Criminal Defense Attorney | Ohio Criminal Defense Attorney | Oklahoma Criminal Defense Attorney | Oregon Criminal Defense Attorney | Pennsylvania Criminal Defense Attorney | Rhode Island Criminal Defense Attorney | South Carolina Criminal Defense Attorney | South Dakota Criminal Defense Attorney | Tennessee Criminal Defense Attorney | Texas Criminal Defense Attorney | Utah Criminal Defense Attorney | Vermont Criminal Defense Attorney | Virginia Criminal Defense Attorney | Washington Criminal Defense Attorney | West Virginia Criminal Defense Attorney | Wisconsin Criminal Defense Attorney | Wyoming Criminal Defense Attorney |

    Browse and read hundreds of articles on legal topics topics.

    Criminal Defense Index | Vegas Lawyer Home

    Juvenile delinquency prosecution


    Juvenile delinquency prosecution -- introduction

    Nearly two-thirds of all youth arrested are referred to a court with juvenile jurisdiction for further processing. Juvenile Offenders and Victims: A National Report, National Center for Juvenile Justice (August, 1995). Cases that progress through the system may result in adjudication and court-ordered supervision or out-of-home placement, or may result in transfer for criminal (adult) prosecution. Id. Over the five-year period from 1988 through 1992, the juvenile courts saw a disproportional increase in violent offense cases and weapon law violations. Id.

    Many gang members and other violent offenders are under the age of eighteen when they commit criminal acts. Therefore, under 18 U.S.C.A. § 5031, these offenders are classified as "juveniles" for purposes of federal prosecution. Federal crimes committed by the juveniles which would be crimes if committed by an adult or violations of 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(x) are classified as acts of "juvenile delinquency." Gang members are treated as adults for federal criminal prosecutions if they have attained their eighteenth birthday when they commit federal crimes.

    At common law, one accused of a crime was treated essentially the same whether he was an infant or an adult. It was presumed that a person under the age of seven could not entertain criminal intent and thus was incapable of committing a crime. Allen v. United States, 150 U.S. 551, 14 S. Ct. 196, 37 L. Ed. 1179 (1893). One between the ages of seven and fourteen was presumed incapable of entertaining criminal intent but such presumption was rebuttable. Id. A person fourteen years of age and older was prima facie capable of committing crime. Id.

    Prior to 1938, there was no federal legislation providing for special treatment for juveniles. In 1938, the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act was passed with the essential purpose of keeping juveniles apart from adult criminals. The original legislation provided juveniles with certain important rights including the right not to be sentenced to a term beyond the age of twenty-one. This early law also provided that an individual could be prosecuted as a juvenile delinquent only if the Attorney General in his discretion so directed. The 1938 Act gave the Attorney General the option to proceed against juvenile offenders as adults or as delinquents except with regard to those allegedly committing offenses punishable by death or life imprisonment. The Juvenile Delinquency Act was amended in 1948, with few substantive changes.

    In 1974, Congress adopted the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). Its stated purpose was "to provide basic procedural rights for juveniles who came under federal jurisdiction and to bring federal procedures up to the standards set by various model acts, many state codes and court decisions". S. Rep. No. 1011, 93 Cong., 2d Sess., reprinted in 1974 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5283, 5284. The purpose of the Act is to remove juveniles from the ordinary criminal process in order to avoid the stigma of a prior criminal conviction and to encourage treatment and rehabilitation. United States v. One Juvenile Male, 40 F.3d 841, 844 (6th Cir. 1994). This purpose, however, must be balanced against the need to protect the public from violent offenders. Id. The intent of federal laws concerning juveniles are to help ensure that state and local authorities would deal with juvenile offenders whenever possible, keeping juveniles away from the less appropriate federal channels since Congress' desire to channel juveniles into state and local treatment programs is clearly intended in the legislative history of 18 U.S.C.A. § 5032. United States v. Juvenile Male, 864 F. 2d 641, 644 (9th Cir. 1988). Referral to the state courts should always be observed except in the most severe of cases. United States v. Juvenile, 599 F. Supp. 1126, 1130 (D. Or. 1984).

    This information came from a USDOJ online article.

    *** Any law, statute, regulation or other precedent is subject to change at any time ***

    Top | Index | Home

    Read this disclaimer before contacting a lawyer.

    Contact the webmaster.


    Copyright: David Matheny, 2004-2006.