Vegas Lawyer
Helping People Who
Were Hurt In Nevada

Dempsey, Roberts
& Smith, Ltd.
Attorneys-At-Law


Las Vegas Lawyers
Nevada Legal Help



Home
Car Accidents
Death Claims
Slip & Fall
Medical Injury
Product Defect
Other Claims
E-Mail

Las Vegas Lawyers

Vegas Injury Law

Las Vegas Inury Lawyer


Click Above Or Below To Go To Vegas Lawyer:

vegaslawyer.net

  • Violation Of Statute - Protected Class - Negligence


    medical negligence claim
    Medical Negligence compensation claims in the UK - Free legal advice on GP, NHS, errors, misdiagnosis and surgical mistakes





    • Violation Of Statute - Protected Class - Negligence

    Anderson v. Baltrusaitis, 113 Nev. 963, 967 (Nev. 1997):

    [The Nevada Supreme] court is generally reluctant to affirm the granting of summary judgment in negligence cases. Harrington, 113 Nev. at , 931 P.2d at 1380; Riley v. OPP IX L.P., 112 Nev. 826, 830, 919 P.2d 1071, 1074 (1996). Generally, the question of whether a defendant was negligent in a particular situation is a question of fact for the jury to resolve." Zugel v. Miller, 100 Nev. 525, 528, 688 P.2d 310, 313 (1984).

    Appellant contends that the district court erred in concluding that no genuine issues of material fact existed, and that respondent was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. After reviewing the record on appeal, we conclude that appellant is correct.

    Respondent asserted below that he is within the class of persons that NRS 484.327(1) is intended to protect; thus, according to respondent, appellant's failure to yield to respondent in an unmarked crosswalk constituted negligence per se and entitled respondent to judgment as a matter of law. The district court apparently agreed with respondent in concluding "that the Plaintiff pedestrian failed to yield and that this causal negligence rises above the 50% level." However, appellant's apparent violation of NRS 484.327(1) does not bar his recovery as a matter of law.

    In Ashwood v. Clark County, 113 Nev. 80, 86, 930 P.2d 740, 744 (1997), this court held as follows:

    A violation of statute establishes the duty and breach elements of negligence only if the injured party belongs to the class of persons that the statute was intended to protect, and the injury is of the type against which the statute was intended to protect. Sagebrush Ltd. v. Carson City, 99 Nev. 204, 208, 660 P.2d 1013, 1015 (1983).
    NRS 484.327(1) was enacted to increase the safety of pedestrians crossing in unmarked crosswalks, not to protect motorists from careless pedestrians. Thus, respondent is not a member of the class of persons that NRS 484.327(1) was intended to protect, and appellant's violation of that statute does not automatically preclude his recovery for injuries caused by respondent's negligence. Further, liability "under a negligence per se theory . . . is in general a question of fact for a jury." Zugel, 100 Nev. at 527, 688 P.2d at 312 (citations omitted). Accordingly, summary judgment should not have been granted based on appellant's apparent violation of NRS 484.327(1).

    In the present case, appellant was struck as he crossed the street at an intersection. Further, the evidence in the record on appeal indicates that the intersection is located beside a casino, and that the casino lights may have made pedestrians crossing the intersection particularly visible to motorists. NRS 484.363 provides in pertinent part:

    Duty of driver to decrease speed under certain circumstances. The fact that the speed of a vehicle is lower than the prescribed limits does not relieve a driver from the duty to decrease speed when approaching and crossing an intersection . . . or when special hazards exist or may exist with respect to pedestrians or other traffic.
    Thus, respondent may have had a duty under NRS 484.363 to decrease his speed as he approached the intersection.

    In two somewhat similar cases, Johnson v. Brown, 77 Nev. 61, 359 P.2d 80 (1961), and Fennell v. Miller, 94 Nev. 528, 583 P.2d 455 (1978), both of which arose before the adoption of comparative negligence in NRS 41.141, this court held that summary dismissal of the pedestrian plaintiffs' actions against the defendant drivers was appropriate. In both cases, this court concluded that the drivers had no reason to anticipate that pedestrians might be crossing a darkened street in the middle of a block. Johnson, 77 Nev. at 66, 359 P.2d at 82; Fennell, 94 Nev. at 531, 583 P.2d at 457. First, as Johnson and Fennell were decided before application of comparative negligence, their analysis does not provide guidance in a comparative negligence case. Further, although in the instant case no evidence suggested that respondent was speeding or violating any other traffic laws when he struck appellant, respondent hit appellant while he was crossing near an intersection. Accordingly, unlike Johnson and Fennell, it cannot be said that respondent could not have anticipated pedestrian traffic at that intersection. "It is only when different minds can reasonably arrive at but one result that a fact issue becomes a question of law, justifying a district court in taking the issue from the jury." Nehls v. Leonard, 97 Nev. 325, 329, 630 P.2d 258, 261 (1981) citing Montgomery v. Morgenson, 213 Kan. 167, 515 P.2d 746, 748 (Kan. 1973)) . . .

    Additionally, the fact that respondent was not speeding or violating other traffic laws at the time of the accident does not preclude a finding that respondent's actions constituted a breach of his duty of care. In Doud v. Las Vegas Hilton Corp., 109 Nev. 1096, 1104, 864 P.2d 796, 801 (1993), this court held:
    The determination of whether there has been a breach of duty is generally a question for the jury. This court has stated "litigants are not to be deprived of a trial on the merits if there is the slightest doubt as to the operative facts." Perez v. Las Vegas Medical Center, 107 Nev. 1, 4, 805 P.2d 589, 590 (1991).
    NRS 41.141(1) provides that the comparative negligence of a plaintiff does not bar recovery if that negligence was not greater than the negligence of a defendant. See Harrington, 113 Nev. at 931 P.2d at 1380. In Nevada, a party's negligence is generally considered an issue of fact for the jury to decide. Shepard v. Harrison, 100 Nev. 178, 180, 678 P.2d 670, 672 (1984); see also NRS 41.141(2) (judge shall instruct jury to determine comparative negligence of the parties). Under the circumstances presented here, the district court erred in finding as a matter of law that appellant was more than fifty percent negligent. We conclude, therefore, that genuine issues of material fact exist concerning respondent's duty to appellant and potential breach thereof and appellant's comparative negligence; thus, respondent is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. "This conclusion is consistent with our reluctance to affirm summary judgment in negligence cases and our policy of deciding cases on their merits." Riley v. OPP IX L.P., 112 Nev. at 832, 919 P.2d at 1075.

    *** Any law, statute, regulation or other precedent is subject to change at any time ***

    Index | Home





    Google







    Contact David Matheny, Esq. for a free consultation.

    (702) 388-1229


    Nevada Lawyer
    Nevada Accident
    & Injury Law

    Vegas Lawyer
    Las Vegas
    Injury Lawyer















    Vegas Lawyer
    Nevada Accident
    & Injury Law

    Index | Home

    Wrongful Death | Car Accident | Slip & Fall | Malpractice | Product Defect | Other Claims






    DEMPSEY, ROBERTS & SMITH, LTD.
    520 South Fourth Street, Suite 360
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

    Las Vegas Personal Injury Lawyer

    Las Vegas Lawyers
    Las Vegas Personal Injury Lawyers
    Las Vegas Injury Lawyer
    Las Vegas Accident Lawyer
    Las Vegas Car Accident Lawyer
    Las Vegas Auto Accident Lawyer
    Las Vegas Wrongful Death Lawyer
    Las Vegas Fatal Accident Lawyer
    Las Vegas Lawyer
    Las Vegas Law Firm
    Las Vegas Attorneys
    Las Vegas Personal Injury Attorney
    Las Vegas Injury Attorney
    Las Vegas Accident Attorney
    Las Vegas Car Accident Attorney
    Las Vegas Auto Accident Attorney
    Las Vegas Wrongful Death Attorney
    Las Vegas Fatal Accident Attorney
    Las Vegas Attorney
    Las Vegas Lawyer Help
    Lawyers In Las Vegas
    Personal Injury Lawyer In Las Vegas
    Injury Lawyer In Las Vegas
    Accident Lawyer In Las Vegas
    Car Accident Lawyer In Las Vegas
    Auto Accident Lawyer In Las Vegas
    Wrongful Death Lawyer In Las Vegas
    Fatal Accident Lawyer In Las Vegas
    Lawyer In Las Vegas
         		Las Vegas Legal Help
    Las Vegas Death Claim Lawyer
    Las Vegas Car Wreck Lawyer
    Las Vegas Vehicle Accident Lawyer
    Las Vegas Dangerous Product Lawyer
    Las Vegas Defective Product Lawyer
    Las Vegas Product Liability Lawyer
    Las Vegas Premises Liability Lawyer
    Las Vegas Slip & Fall Lawyer
    Las Vegas Medical Malpractice Lawyer
    Las Vegas Attorney Help
    Las Vegas Death Claim Attorney
    Las Vegas Car Wreck Attorney
    Las Vegas Vehicle Accident Attorney
    Las Vegas Dangerous Product Attorney
    Las Vegas Defective Product Attorney
    Las Vegas Product Liability Attorney
    Las Vegas Premises Liability Attorney
    Las Vegas Slip & Fall Attorney
    Las Vegas Medical Malpractice Attorney
    Death Claim Attorney In Las Vegas
    Car Wreck Attorney In Las Vegas
    Vehicle Accident Attorney In Las Vegas
    Dangerous Product Attorney In Las Vegas
    Defective Product Attorney In Las Vegas
    Product Liability Attorney In Las Vegas
    Premises Liability Attorney In Las Vegas
    Slip & Fall Attorney In Las Vegas
    Medical Malpractice Attorney In Las Vegas



    Contact Las Vegas Lawyers

  • Las Vegas, Nevada
  • Henderson, Nevada
  • Battle Mountain, Nevada
  • Carson City, Nevada
  • Dayton, Nevada
  • Elko, Nevada
  • Ely, Nevada
  • Eureka, Nevada
  • Fallon, Nevada
  • Fernley, Nevada
  • Goldfield, Nevada
  • Hawthorne, Nevada
  • Paradise Township, Nevada
  • Laughlin, Nevada
  • Lovelock, Nevada
  • Minden, Nevada
  • Pahrump, Nevada
  • Pioche, Nevada
  • Reno, Nevada
  • Summerlin, Nevada
  • Tonopah, Nevada
  • Virginia, Nevada
  • Wendover, Nevada
  • Winnemucca, Nevada
  • Yerington, Nevada
  • Zephyr Cove, Nevada
  • Spring Valley, Nevada
  • Mesquite, Nevada



    • Find Las Vegas Lawyers

    Las Vegas Lawyers - Free Consultation


    - Las Vegas Attorney
    ... Product Defect Other Claims E-Mail Vioxx Info Helping People Who Were Hurt In Nevada Las Vegas Lawyers is a web site where you can get legal information about Las Vegas accident claims and ...
    lasvegaslawyers.biz

    Vegas Lawyer - Las Vegas Lawyer - Las Vegas Attorney
    ... 520 South Fourth Street, Suite 360 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 A Lawyer In Las Vegas Can Assist You If You Need Any Of The Following: Las Vegas Lawyers Las Vegas Personal Injury Lawyers Las Vegas Injury ...
    vegaslawyer.net

    Nevada Probate Lawyers - Las Vegas Probate Attorney - Estate Administration ...
    ... Estate Lawyer Nevada Estate Attorney Probate Lawyer In Nevada Las Vegas Probate Lawyer Las Vegas Probate Lawyers Las Vegas Probate Attorney Las Vegas Probate Attorneys Las Vegas Estate Lawyer Las ...
    nevadaprobatelawyers.com
    Nevada Lawyer - David Matheny, Esq. - Nevada Personal Injury Law
    ... 520 South Fourth Street, Suite 360 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 lawyer in las vegas • injury lawyer in las vegas • accident lawyer in las vegas • car accident lawyer in las vegas • auto accident lawyer in ...
    nevadalawyer.org
    Vegas Law - Las Vegas Lawyer - Las Vegas Personal Injury Law
    ... Las Vegas Lawyers Can Assist You With: Las Vegas Lawyer Las Vegas Attorney Las Vegas Injury Lawyer Las Vegas Injury Attorney Las Vegas Personal Injury Lawyer Las Vegas Accident Attorney Las Vegas Car ...
    vegaslaw.org

    Las Vegas Personal Injury Attorney - Las Vegas Personal Injury Lawyers - Per...
    LasVegasLawyers Helping People Who Were Hurt In Nevada ___________________ Las Vegas Personal Injury Attorney Las Vegas Lawyers ___________________ Home Car Accident Death Claim Slip & Fall ...
    lasvegaslawyers.biz/nvatty4.html
    Vegas Lawyer - Las Vegas Personal Injury Lawyers
    ... Attorneys-At-Law Las Vegas Personal Injury Lawyers Nevada Legal Help Home Car Accidents Death Claims Slip & Fall Medical Injury Product Defect Other Claims E-Mail Las Vegas Personal Injury Lawyers ...
    vegaslawyer.net/nvatty4.html

    Vegas Lawyer - Las Vegas Lawyer - Las Vegas Attorney
    ... 520 South Fourth Street, Suite 360 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 A Lawyer In Las Vegas Can Assist You If You Need Any Of The Following: Las Vegas Lawyers Las Vegas Personal Injury Lawyers Las Vegas Injury ...
    vegaslawyer.net/index.html

    Read This Important Disclaimer




    Copyright: David Matheny, 2003-2005.